Comments on: Another aggravating read http://luckbeababy.wordpress.com/2008/01/31/another-aggravating-read/ May Luck Be a Baby Tonight Thu, 09 Apr 2009 04:00:38 +0000 http://wordpress.com/ hourly 1 By: Kay http://luckbeababy.wordpress.com/2008/01/31/another-aggravating-read/#comment-2816 Kay Tue, 27 May 2008 18:20:53 +0000 http://luckbeababy.wordpress.com/?p=286#comment-2816 Wow. That's apalling. It hurts my unborn babies' feelings. BTW, they are going to LOVE their life, after IVF finally lets them get conceived and born. Wow. That’s apalling. It hurts my unborn babies’ feelings. BTW, they are going to LOVE their life, after IVF finally lets them get conceived and born.

]]> By: niobe http://luckbeababy.wordpress.com/2008/01/31/another-aggravating-read/#comment-2798 niobe Wed, 06 Feb 2008 14:53:05 +0000 http://luckbeababy.wordpress.com/?p=286#comment-2798 Should I be feeling hurt that she's not mentioning my blog as one of those evil baby trade sites? ;) What a maroon. Should I be feeling hurt that she’s not mentioning my blog as one of those evil baby trade sites? ;)

What a maroon.

]]> By: Samantha http://luckbeababy.wordpress.com/2008/01/31/another-aggravating-read/#comment-2793 Samantha Fri, 01 Feb 2008 13:05:32 +0000 http://luckbeababy.wordpress.com/?p=286#comment-2793 Bea's on the money: no child has the right to say whether or not they want to be born, and I'm not sure how infertility makes this any different. For many couples, without treatment, the child would not have the option to exist, and by her logic, wouldn't that be denying the child's rights? On the bright side, I don't think the site's heavily read, and I suspect someone with views like that has no interest in considering anything other than their own vitriolic views, so ignoring it is probably the best course of action. Bea’s on the money: no child has the right to say whether or not they want to be born, and I’m not sure how infertility makes this any different. For many couples, without treatment, the child would not have the option to exist, and by her logic, wouldn’t that be denying the child’s rights?

On the bright side, I don’t think the site’s heavily read, and I suspect someone with views like that has no interest in considering anything other than their own vitriolic views, so ignoring it is probably the best course of action.

]]> By: Bea http://luckbeababy.wordpress.com/2008/01/31/another-aggravating-read/#comment-2791 Bea Fri, 01 Feb 2008 01:46:56 +0000 http://luckbeababy.wordpress.com/?p=286#comment-2791 P.S. Where does that quote come from on her blog? Bea P.S. Where does that quote come from on her blog?

Bea

]]> By: Bea http://luckbeababy.wordpress.com/2008/01/31/another-aggravating-read/#comment-2790 Bea Fri, 01 Feb 2008 01:45:58 +0000 http://luckbeababy.wordpress.com/?p=286#comment-2790 She's right. Having children is a clear violation of their rights, which they don't have, unless they're violated in the first place. I'm still not clear why she's singling out infertile couples, though? Bea She’s right. Having children is a clear violation of their rights, which they don’t have, unless they’re violated in the first place. I’m still not clear why she’s singling out infertile couples, though?

Bea

]]> By: Tracy http://luckbeababy.wordpress.com/2008/01/31/another-aggravating-read/#comment-2784 Tracy Thu, 31 Jan 2008 18:40:45 +0000 http://luckbeababy.wordpress.com/?p=286#comment-2784 I wish I knew which non-profit she works for. Did you click over to any of the blogs she has listed as anti-donor? They're all brief, poorly maintained blogs. I'm not saying there aren't real societal considerations with donor gametes, but it seems like there are more people benefiting than suffering if you ask me? I wish I knew which non-profit she works for.

Did you click over to any of the blogs she has listed as anti-donor? They’re all brief, poorly maintained blogs. I’m not saying there aren’t real societal considerations with donor gametes, but it seems like there are more people benefiting than suffering if you ask me?

]]>